In another episode of "Things Sane People Don't Really Care About" I present to you something that has been bugging me for quite some time now: The inaccuracies with the traditional Mercator Map.
The Mercator Map(which is the standardized map of the world as we know it) suffers from a lot of inaccuracies and misrepresentations. Given that its a "conformal map"- i.e. based on a visual impression of shape, it ignores relative size and proportionality.
Why should you give a hootininny about this? Well, for starters:
1) Africa is 11.6 million sq miles while the former Soviet Union is 8.7 million sq miles. Now take a look at the highlighted portions on the traditional Mercator map below. Does this still appear to be the case?

2) Greenland is 0.8 million sq miles while China is 3.7 million sq miles. Looking at the Mercator map below would lead one to think the EXACT opposite.

My gripe is that this (Mercator) map is the map we grew up on! I mean, from a very young age, we were conditioned to look at the world in a certain way- a way that misrepresented the relative size of many countries. This causes a lot of geographical and cultural bias: Human perception and understanding is relative- Looking at Greenland relative to China would give the impression that Greenland is a lot larger than China, and thus (maybe) a lot more rich in natural resources owing to an abundance of land.
Africa is depicted much, much smaller than the former Soviet Union- which again, is troubling. Imagine if Africa was depicted proportionally to what its actual size was---suddenly, all its internal problems would start looking a lot more urgent given its sheer size.
The things I choose to care about.